[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Indexing Databases::
To Authors::
To Referees::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2018
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Registered in



:: Peer review ::
 | Post date: 2018/08/27 | 
  1. Reviewers should keep all article data confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviews should be conducted with no personal criticism of the author, self-knowledge of the author(s) must not affect the reviewers’ comments or decision.
  3. Reviewers should express their supporting views in 500-1000 words.
  4. Reviewers may suggest relevant published articles that have not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also inform the editor-in-chief on any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper.
  6. Reviewers should refrain from reviewing the papers in which they have conflicts of interest due to having competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
View: 4774 Time(s)   |   Print: 696 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
:: ReviewProcess ::


 All manuscript reports with scientific and effective novelty are considered for reviewing. At first, the formats, styles and scientific value of submitted manuscript are assessed by editorial board. If the submitted manuscript was compatible with the guidelines of the journal, it would be sent to three qualified and specialized reviewers according to the topic of the manuscript; otherwise it would be rejected or sent back to the corresponding author for necessary corrections.

The names of authors and reviewers would be mutually doubleblinded. However, the authors could offer reviewers for their manuscripts. The comments of reviewers along with the decision of editorial board are forwarded to the corresponding author. The final decision letter is sent to the corresponding author after that the reviewers comments have been answered appropriately.  

View: 8750 Time(s)   |   Print: 964 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
مجله ی تحقیقات پایه در علوم پزشکی Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4613