[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About Journal::
Editorial Board::
Articles Archive::
Indexing Databases::
To Authors::
To Reviewers::
Registration::
Submit Your Article::
Policies and Publication Ethics::
Archiving Policy::
Site Facilities::
Contact Us::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations804666
h-index1211
i10-index1714
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 12, Issue 1 (1-2025) ::
2025, 12(1): 26-33 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of problem-solving learning and lecture methods on the level of satisfaction with teaching and learning (Quasi-experimental)
Sara Mohammadnejad , Hamid Heidarzadeh , Maryam Pakseresht , Alireza Vasiee , Safoura Taheri
Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran , taheri_safura@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (129 Views)
Introduction: Students' cognitive capacities are enhanced via the implementation of innovative pedagogical practices, which in turn motivate them to apply their reasoning abilities to solve issues more efficiently and with better quality. Therefore, the current study was conducted to compare problem-solving learning (PBL) and lecture methods on the level of satisfaction with teaching and learning.
Method: This was a quasi-experimental research which done in the Ilam university of medical sciences in the 2022 by a study sample consisting of forty emergency medical associate students by convenient sampling approach and random allocation to control and intervention groups by dice-throw. The tools also included questionnaires on demographic information, satisfaction with teaching, and learning rate, which were completed before and two weeks after the end of the intervention. Descriptive and analytical tests were done in SPSS V.16 by considering alpha at the level of 0.05.
Findings: The mean and standard deviation of the total age of the participants was 20.09±1.14. Before intervention, there wasn’t any significant difference in learning satisfaction and learning rate between two groups. However, after intervention, there was a significant difference in learning satisfaction and learning rate between two groups (P=0.003 and P=0.001).
Conclusion: Teaching by problem-solving methods has increased the satisfaction of teaching and improved the learning rate of students.
Keywords: Problem-solving learning, Lecture, Satisfaction, Teaching
Full-Text [PDF 840 kb]   (88 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2024/04/7 | Accepted: 2024/06/26 | Published: 2025/01/12
References
1. Asarta CJ, Schmidt JR. The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. Int & High Educ. 2020;44:100708. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100708.]
2. Serin H. A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings. Inter J Social Sci Educ Stud. 2018;5 (1):164-7. doi: 10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164.
3. Raoufi S FA, Sheikhian A. Impact of the team effectiveness design of teaching on critical thinking, self-confidence and learning of nursing students. J Med Educ Dvlp. 2014;9(2):1.
4. Montafej J, Lotfi A, Chalak A. The Effectiveness of Hybrid and Pure Problem-Based Learning in the Productive Skills and Critical Thinking of Iranian Undergraduate Students through MALL Application. Educ Res Inter. 2022;2022:1-11. doi: 10.1155/2022/1531210.
5. Davari FV, Teymouri F, Amoli HA, Mojtabavi H, Sharifi A, Alaeddini F, et al. Problem-based learning as an effective method for teaching theoretical surgery courses to medical students. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:477. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_266_21.
6. Soleymani S, Aliabadi K, Zaraii Zavaraki I, Delavar A. The Effect of Flipped Learning Pattern (FLP) in Terms of Problem-Based Teaching Approach (PBTA) on Applicants’ Self-Directed Learning (SDL) Towards the English Courses. JFLTTS. 2021;6(2):87-116. doi: 10.22034/efl.2021.284762.1096.
7. Hendrickson P. Effect of Active Learning Techniques on Student Excitement, Interest, and Self-Efficacy. J Politic Sci Educ. 2019;17:1-15. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1629946.
8. Wang M, Derry S, Ge X. Guest editorial: Fostering deep learning in problem-solving contexts with the support of technology. J Educ Tech Soc. 2017;20(4):162-5. doi: 10.1007/s11263-015-0813-1.
9. Lukitasari M, Purnamasari, I., Utami, S. & Sukri, A. Blended-Problem-Based Learning: How its impact on students' critical thinking skills? JPBI. 2019; 5(3):425-34. doi: doi: [DOI:10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.10048.]
10. Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L’Estrade Ehrstrom B, Wortley D, Lilienthal A, Tudor Car L, et al. Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: systematic review. J Med Internet R. 2019;21(3):e12994. doi: 10.2196/12994.
11. Karami M, Hashemi N, van Merrienboer J. Medical educators' beliefs about learning goals, teaching, and assessment in the context of curriculum changes: a qualitative study conducted at an Iranian medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02878-3.
12. Cheok ML, Wong SL. Predictors of e-learning satisfaction in teaching and learning for school teachers: A literature review. Int J Instr. 2015;8(1):75-90. doi: 10.12973/iji.2015.816a.
13. Olanike S A, Asogwa CN, Njideka M O, RE ED, Temiloluwa O S. A Comparison of Perceptions of Assessment Practices in Higher Institutions between Academic Staff and Students: A Case Study of Federal College of Education, Yola. Inter J Social Sci Educ Stud. 2023;10(3). doi: 10.1080/02602930500099102.
14. Haghighat H, Shiri M, Esmaeili Abdar M, Taher Harikandee SS, Tayebi Z. The effect of micro-learning on trauma care knowledge and learning satisfaction in nursing students. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04609-2.
15. Murad MK, Larsen S, Husum H. Prehospital trauma care reduces mortality. Ten-year results from a time-cohort and trauma audit study in Iraq. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20(1):1-10. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-13.
16. Lin K-M. e-Learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. J Computers Educ. 2011;56(2):515-26. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.017.
17. Acquandoh E, Zunurain Z, Kwakye DO, Adornyo S. Effects of teaching students through problem-solving on students’ academic performance in problem-solving. J Gntg. 2022;7(2):121-7. doi: 10.31629/jg.v7i2.5314.
18. McInerney N, Nally D, Khan M, Heneghan H, Cahill R. Performance effects of simulation training for medical students–a systematic review. GMS J Med Educ. 2022;39(5). doi: 10.3205/zma001572.
19. Ssemugenyi F. Teaching and learning methods compared: A pedagogical evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture methods in developing learners’ cognitive abilities. J Cogent Education. 2023;10(1):2187943. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2187943.
20. Falahan SN, Habibi E, Kamyari N, Yousofvand V. Impact of virtual problem-based learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on fourth-year nursing students’ satisfaction and performance: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05375-5.
21. Husebø AML, Storm M, Våga BB, Rosenberg A, Akerjordet K. Status of knowledge on student‐learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed‐method systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7-8):e1344-e59. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14299.
22. Hoque KE, Wang X, Qi Y, Norzan N. The factors associated with teachers’ job satisfaction and their impacts on students’ achievement: a review (2010–2021). Human Soc Sci Comm J. 2023;10(1):1-7. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01645-7.
23. Doménech-Betoret F, Gómez-Artiga A, Abellán-Roselló L. The educational situation quality model: a new tool to explain and improve academic achievement and course satisfaction. Front Psychol. 2019;10:473959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01692.
24. Koohpayeh SA, Vasli P, Rohani C, Nasiri M. Comparison of the effects of applying problem-based learning and lecture-based learning on menstrual hygiene behaviors and food habits of adolescent girls in Iran. Inter J Health Prom and Educ. 2022:1-17. doi: 10.1080/14635240.2022.2075427.
25. Klein K, Calabrese J, Aguiar A, Mathew S, Ajani K, Almajid R, et al. Evaluating Active Lecture and Traditional Lecture in Higher Education. J Empoweri Tech Excell. 2023;7(2):6. doi: 10.26077/ba42-a5cc.
26. Zhao W, He L, Deng W, Zhu J, Su A, Zhang Y. The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadnejad S, Heidarzadeh H, Pakseresht M, Vasiee A, Taheri S. Comparison of problem-solving learning and lecture methods on the level of satisfaction with teaching and learning (Quasi-experimental). Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences 2025; 12 (1) :26-33
URL: http://jbrms.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 1 (1-2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله ی تحقیقات پایه در علوم پزشکی Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4671