Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 4 (9-2024)
jbrms 2024, 11(4): 28-33 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Feili F, Athar A, Shafiei E, sidkhani H. Investigating the Causes of Failure in Posterior Amalgam and Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study. jbrms 2024; 11 (4) :28-33
URL: http://jbrms.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-858-en.html
URL: http://jbrms.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-858-en.html
Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran , eshafiei1524@gmail.com
Abstract: (690 Views)
Introduction: Understanding the reasons for retreatment of dental restorations is crucial to preventing potential tooth failure. Due to limited information on retreatment causes in our region, this study aims to compare the factors leading to the failure of posterior amalgam and composite restorations.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on patients referred to the restorative department of Ilam Faculty of Dentistry and private clinics who required retreatment of existing posterior restorations. Failure criteria for posterior restorations were evaluated based on established reference guidelines.
Results: The study found that secondary caries had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.08 (95% CI: 2.85 – 3.29; p < 0.001), indicating a strong association with restoration failure. Additionally, restoration fractures were significantly correlated with retreatment, with an adjusted OR of 2.50 (95% CI: 2.46 – 2.86; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Secondary caries emerged as the most common reason for retreatment, regardless of whether composite or amalgam materials were used. Restoration fractures also significantly contributed to the need for retreatment. Therefore, it is essential to consider factors such as restoration material, classification, and the number of restoration levels to reduce the likelihood of retreatment.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on patients referred to the restorative department of Ilam Faculty of Dentistry and private clinics who required retreatment of existing posterior restorations. Failure criteria for posterior restorations were evaluated based on established reference guidelines.
Results: The study found that secondary caries had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.08 (95% CI: 2.85 – 3.29; p < 0.001), indicating a strong association with restoration failure. Additionally, restoration fractures were significantly correlated with retreatment, with an adjusted OR of 2.50 (95% CI: 2.46 – 2.86; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Secondary caries emerged as the most common reason for retreatment, regardless of whether composite or amalgam materials were used. Restoration fractures also significantly contributed to the need for retreatment. Therefore, it is essential to consider factors such as restoration material, classification, and the number of restoration levels to reduce the likelihood of retreatment.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Dentistry
Received: 2024/05/20 | Accepted: 2024/06/8 | Published: 2024/09/18
Received: 2024/05/20 | Accepted: 2024/06/8 | Published: 2024/09/18
References
1. Alhoshani RN, Khan AM. Assessment of Prevalence and Causative Factors for Replacement of Composite and Amalgam Restorations: An Observational Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci.2024;16(Suppl 1):S693-S7. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_946_23
2. de Azevedo Miranda D, Silveira LE, Schirm JA, de Abreu Lima IL, Manzi FR. The “Phase Down” of Dental Amalgam Restorations–What are the Criteria for Replacement and Indication? Pesqui Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2024;24:e220172-e. doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2024.028
3. Wigsten E, Fransson H, Isberg PE, EndoReCo, Dawson VS. General dental practitioners' fees for root canal treatment, coronal restoration and follow‐on treatment in the adult population in Sweden: A 10‐year follow‐up of data from the Swedish Dental Register. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;10(1):e826. doi.org/10.1002/cre2.826
4. Thyvalikakath T, Siddiqui ZA, Eckert G, LaPradd M, Duncan WD, Gordan VV, et al. Survival analysis of posterior composite restorations in National Dental PBRN general dentistry practices. J Dent. 2024;141:104831. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104831
5. Oksa M, Haapanen A, Kannari L, Furuholm J, Snäll J. Surgical treatment of clinically infected mandibular fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024:1-9. doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01213-6.
6. Gharechahi M, Rouhani A, Ahmadi AK, Davaji M. The necessity and reasons for referrals to endodontists among general dentists in Mashhad: A cross-sectional study. Saudi Endod J. 2024;14(1). DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_103_23
7. Alqutaibi AY, Alghauli MA, Almuzaini SA, Alharbi AF, Alsani AA, Mubarak AM, et al. Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent.2024. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13238
8. Sekundo C, Jung M, Muscholl C, Frese C. Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):777. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51223-3
9. Poletto-Neto V, Chisini LA, Fokkinga W, Kreulen C, Loomans B, Cenci MS, et al. Single crown vs. composite for glass fiber post-retained restorations: An 8-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2024;142:104837. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104837
10. Arandi NZ. Current trends in placing posterior composite restorations: Perspectives from Palestinian general dentists: A questionnair study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024;14(2):112-20. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_157_23
11. Jang Y-E, Kim Y, Kim S-Y, Kim BS. Predicting early endodontic treatment failure following primary root canal treatment. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):327. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03974-8
12. Mosavat F, Ahmadi E, Aghajani F, Ramezani S. Effect of composite radiopacity and margin location of the restoration on the diagnosis of secondary caries. Braz Dent J. 2024;35:e24-5583
13. Innes N, Fairhurst C, Whiteside K, Ainsworth H, Sykes D, El Yousfi S, et al. Behaviour change intervention for toothbrushing (lesson and text messages) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: The BRIGHT randomized control trial. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024. doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12940
14. Bokhari AM, Vinothkumar TS, Albar N, Basheer SN, Felsypremila G, Khayat WF, et al. Barriers in Rubber Dam Isolation Behaviour of Dental Students During Adhesive Restorative Treatments: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2024;16(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.58329
15. Frost PM. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice. Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK). 2002;9(1):31-6.10.1308/135576102322547548. doi.org/10.1308/13557610232254
16. Goldstein GR. The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10(1):30-1. Doi.10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.015
17. Kuchibhotla N, Sathyamoorthy H, Balakrishnan S, Somaraju NP, Mohan A, Ginjupalli K, et al. Effect of Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract.2024;25(3):245-9.
18. Palotie U, Vehkalahti M. Reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in posterior teeth of young Finnish adults. Acta Odontol Scand.2002;60(6):325-9.doi.10.1080/000163502762667333
19. Kimyai S, Mehdipour M, Savadi Oskoee S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Abbaszadeh A. Reasons for Retreatment of Amalgam and Composite Restorations among the Patients Referring to Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1(1):27-31.doi.10.5681/joddd.2007.005
20. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper. Dent. 2002;27(2):117-23.
21. Abdal kh, Yari A, Bonyadi M, Shafiei E. Predictive Role of Ectopic Calcifications on Digital Panoramic Radiographs in the West of Iran . J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2023 ;8(4).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |