[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About Journal::
Mission & scope
Bibliographic information of the Journal
Open access statement
Copyright statement
Editorial Board::
Articles Archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Indexing Databases::
To Authors::
Why submit?
Publishing process - step by step
Authors’ guidelines
Online Submission
Editorial policy
ethical statement
To Reviewers::
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Submit Your Article::
Policies and Publication Ethics::
Archiving Policy::
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact Us::
Contact Information
Contact Form
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations794658
h-index1211
i10-index1714
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 4 (9-2024) ::
2024, 11(4): 28-33 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Causes of Failure in Posterior Amalgam and Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study
Fahimeh Feili , Athar Athar , Elham Shafiei , Hosein Sidkhani
Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran , eshafiei1524@gmail.com
Abstract:   (202 Views)
Introduction: Understanding the reasons for retreatment of dental restorations is crucial to preventing potential tooth failure. Due to limited information on retreatment causes in our region, this study aims to compare the factors leading to the failure of posterior amalgam and composite restorations.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on patients referred to the restorative department of Ilam Faculty of Dentistry and private clinics who required retreatment of existing posterior restorations. Failure criteria for posterior restorations were evaluated based on established reference guidelines.
Results:  The study found that secondary caries had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.08 (95% CI: 2.85 – 3.29; p < 0.001), indicating a strong association with restoration failure. Additionally, restoration fractures were significantly correlated with retreatment, with an adjusted OR of 2.50 (95% CI: 2.46 – 2.86; p < 0.001).
Conclusion:  Secondary caries emerged as the most common reason for retreatment, regardless of whether composite or amalgam materials were used. Restoration fractures also significantly contributed to the need for retreatment. Therefore, it is essential to consider factors such as restoration material, classification, and the number of restoration levels to reduce the likelihood of retreatment.
Keywords: Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Amalgam, Composite Resins, Retreatment
Full-Text [PDF 1122 kb]   (62 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Dentistry
Received: 2024/05/20 | Accepted: 2024/06/8 | Published: 2024/09/18
References
1. Alhoshani RN, Khan AM. Assessment of Prevalence and Causative Factors for Replacement of Composite and Amalgam Restorations: An Observational Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci.2024;16(Suppl 1):S693-S7. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_946_23
2. de Azevedo Miranda D, Silveira LE, Schirm JA, de Abreu Lima IL, Manzi FR. The “Phase Down” of Dental Amalgam Restorations–What are the Criteria for Replacement and Indication? Pesqui Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2024;24:e220172-e. doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2024.028
3. Wigsten E, Fransson H, Isberg PE, EndoReCo, Dawson VS. General dental practitioners' fees for root canal treatment, coronal restoration and follow‐on treatment in the adult population in Sweden: A 10‐year follow‐up of data from the Swedish Dental Register. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;10(1):e826. doi.org/10.1002/cre2.826
4. Thyvalikakath T, Siddiqui ZA, Eckert G, LaPradd M, Duncan WD, Gordan VV, et al. Survival analysis of posterior composite restorations in National Dental PBRN general dentistry practices. J Dent. 2024;141:104831. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104831
5. Oksa M, Haapanen A, Kannari L, Furuholm J, Snäll J. Surgical treatment of clinically infected mandibular fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024:1-9. doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01213-6.
6. Gharechahi M, Rouhani A, Ahmadi AK, Davaji M. The necessity and reasons for referrals to endodontists among general dentists in Mashhad: A cross-sectional study. Saudi Endod J. 2024;14(1). DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_103_23
7. Alqutaibi AY, Alghauli MA, Almuzaini SA, Alharbi AF, Alsani AA, Mubarak AM, et al. Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent.2024. doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13238
8. Sekundo C, Jung M, Muscholl C, Frese C. Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):777. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51223-3
9. Poletto-Neto V, Chisini LA, Fokkinga W, Kreulen C, Loomans B, Cenci MS, et al. Single crown vs. composite for glass fiber post-retained restorations: An 8-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2024;142:104837. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104837
10. Arandi NZ. Current trends in placing posterior composite restorations: Perspectives from Palestinian general dentists: A questionnair study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024;14(2):112-20. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_157_23
11. Jang Y-E, Kim Y, Kim S-Y, Kim BS. Predicting early endodontic treatment failure following primary root canal treatment. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):327. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03974-8
12. Mosavat F, Ahmadi E, Aghajani F, Ramezani S. Effect of composite radiopacity and margin location of the restoration on the diagnosis of secondary caries. Braz Dent J. 2024;35:e24-5583
13. Innes N, Fairhurst C, Whiteside K, Ainsworth H, Sykes D, El Yousfi S, et al. Behaviour change intervention for toothbrushing (lesson and text messages) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: The BRIGHT randomized control trial. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024. doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12940
14. Bokhari AM, Vinothkumar TS, Albar N, Basheer SN, Felsypremila G, Khayat WF, et al. Barriers in Rubber Dam Isolation Behaviour of Dental Students During Adhesive Restorative Treatments: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2024;16(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.58329
15. Frost PM. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice. Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK). 2002;9(1):31-6.10.1308/135576102322547548. doi.org/10.1308/13557610232254
16. Goldstein GR. The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10(1):30-1. Doi.10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.015
17. Kuchibhotla N, Sathyamoorthy H, Balakrishnan S, Somaraju NP, Mohan A, Ginjupalli K, et al. Effect of Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strength of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract.2024;25(3):245-9.
18. Palotie U, Vehkalahti M. Reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in posterior teeth of young Finnish adults. Acta Odontol Scand.2002;60(6):325-9.doi.10.1080/000163502762667333
19. Kimyai S, Mehdipour M, Savadi Oskoee S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Abbaszadeh A. Reasons for Retreatment of Amalgam and Composite Restorations among the Patients Referring to Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1(1):27-31.doi.10.5681/joddd.2007.005
20. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper. Dent. 2002;27(2):117-23.
21. Abdal kh, Yari A, Bonyadi M, Shafiei E. Predictive Role of Ectopic Calcifications on Digital Panoramic Radiographs in the West of Iran . J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2023 ;8(4).
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Feili F, Athar A, Shafiei E, sidkhani H. Investigating the Causes of Failure in Posterior Amalgam and Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences 2024; 11 (4) :28-33
URL: http://jbrms.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-858-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 4 (9-2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله ی تحقیقات پایه در علوم پزشکی Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4667